Dec 29, · A similar situation (without the PhD context) would be that a reviewer recommends rejection of a novel paper after a similar paper got published (while your paper was under review). Additional note: my advisor agrees that there are still novel aspects to my thesis and they feel that the reviewer is "asking for too much from a PhD thesis" This answer has some excellent points — e.g. the core answer that a PhD thesis must demonstrate the candidate’s capability as a scientist, and that’s why it needs novelty — mixed in with some very tendentious and field-dependent claims, like the idea ‘“successful” is to be understood as “We have been able to demonstrate with certainty that” rather than “there is a correlation/impact/link between A and The novelty of this thesis is that it analyses, in a common conceptual framework, the different policies that Latin American countries have implemented in order to get some developmentally useful economic input from their diaspora
The scientific novelty of the thesis: an example.
Writing Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for the craft of professional writing, including fiction, non-fiction, technical, scholarly, and commercial writing. It only takes a minute to sign up. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
I'm being asked to 'clearly state the novelty' in my thesis. I suspect my phd thesis novelty would love to actually have a section titled 'Novelty' in big, black letters. Personally, phd thesis novelty, I phd thesis novelty this is against the spirit of writing a thesis, because a thesis is not a report of what one has done with their time, but a work sample which shows one can write scientifically. Of course it should be clear to a reader which parts are novel and which parts aren't.
But that should be apparent from the final and intermediate phd thesis novelty. Also, my supervisor seems to think the 'Novelty' section should be part of the Introduction. Now, to me this completely breaks the flow because I work hard to introduce one concept at a time throughout the thesis, so every new piece of information rests on something that has already been discussed.
That's really hard to do if I'm to write what will be the end result before I have even defined the phd thesis novelty I need to use. From a structuring point of view not particularly an Academia point of vieware my qualms justified? And if yes, is there a graceful way to write what will be the final result of a thesis without using concepts that haven't been introduced? Phenomena being researched.
Even if the general topic has been researched to death, your research explores some specific detail that has not been studied before. Your research was motivated by some earlier results, likely from earlier scientific research. Perhaps the earlier research recommended further study in some of the specifics. If your research falls within those specifics, you can introduce the novelty of your thesis by citing those recommendations.
Their recommendation is a hint that at the time of publication, at least there was something both interesting and unknown. Method of research, phd thesis novelty. Even if your research consists entirely of tried-and-true methods, there will be something different in how you applied them. At very least, phd thesis novelty, you will have applied the methods to some new specific detail where they have been not previously applied.
Your results will not be exactly like anyone else's. Even if your research does nothing more than confirm some other research, that confirmation is novel.
Even if you are not following up on some earlier researchers' recommendations, there is something in earlier research that motivated you or your advisor. Some phenomenon that would be interesting to know about, yet remained unknown. Something that made you say, phd thesis novelty, "Ah, this is worth exploring. Your thesis had better say something new about phenomena being studied, methods, results, or some other noveltyor there is no point reading it. The job of the introduction is to help readers decide whether to make the effort to read the rest of the thesis.
Thesis readers are almost certainly motivated by the desire to learn some new thing that matters to them in an area where they have an interest. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams?
Learn more. Gracefully state novelty of a thesis in the introduction Ask Question. Asked 6 years, 4 months ago.
Active 6 years, 4 months ago. Viewed 3k times. structure scientific-publishing. Improve this question, phd thesis novelty. asked Mar 30 '15 at phd thesis novelty Johannes Bauer Johannes Bauer 2 2 silver badges 3 3 bronze badges.
Use the Buzzfeed method. And what happens after Y will shock you. Your thesis must include an overview of the research that has been done. You must then explain what you are doing differently, and why your approach is valid. This is the introduction, phd thesis novelty it must be repeated in the discussion.
Weren't you taught how to structure academic writing? Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Your thesis is motivated by some need.
Novelty is hiding there. Areas of Novelty Consider at least these areas where your thesis might offer something new: Phenomena being researched, phd thesis novelty. That's novelty. If your research fills the gap, or offers the potential to fill phd thesis novelty, that's novelty. Your Motivation Even if you are not following up on some earlier researchers' recommendations, there is something in earlier research that motivated you or your advisor.
The Reader's Phd thesis novelty Another way to look at this: Why would anyone bother to read your thesis?
So ask yourself: What will the reader gain from reading this? If you can answer that, phd thesis novelty, that's novelty. The Introduction The job of the introduction is to help readers decide whether to make the effort to read the rest of the thesis. So write your introduction to help them figure out: Is this in my area of interest?
What is here for me to learn? What new thing? How does this matter to me? To do that: Describe the motivation for your research. Especially the key details you were trying to explore. Describe what's new in your research phd thesis novelty, or in how you applied research methods. Summarize what's new in your results and conclusions. Improve this answer. edited Mar 30 '15 at answered Mar 30 '15 at Dale Hartley Emery Dale Hartley Emery Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.
Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown.
Featured on Meta. Join me in Welcoming Valued Associates: - Slate - and - Vanny. Related 0. Hot Network Questions. Question feed. Writing Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled. Accept all cookies Customize settings.
The Perfect Defense: The Oral Defense of a Dissertation
, time: 22:00phd - Why is novelty mandatory for a Ph.D. degree? - Academia Stack Exchange
This answer has some excellent points — e.g. the core answer that a PhD thesis must demonstrate the candidate’s capability as a scientist, and that’s why it needs novelty — mixed in with some very tendentious and field-dependent claims, like the idea ‘“successful” is to be understood as “We have been able to demonstrate with certainty that” rather than “there is a correlation/impact/link between A and The novelty of this thesis is that it analyses, in a common conceptual framework, the different policies that Latin American countries have implemented in order to get some developmentally useful economic input from their diaspora Dec 29, · A similar situation (without the PhD context) would be that a reviewer recommends rejection of a novel paper after a similar paper got published (while your paper was under review). Additional note: my advisor agrees that there are still novel aspects to my thesis and they feel that the reviewer is "asking for too much from a PhD thesis"
No comments:
Post a Comment